We build a Google review reply tool (Resparo), so treat this like a roundup with the cards on the table. MARA is a real, well-regarded review-reply tool built specifically for hotels, and for the right hotel it earns its price. This is an honest look at who that is, who it isn't, and what to use instead if you're paying for platforms you don't actually need.
What MARA actually does
MARA is an AI reply assistant built specifically for hotels and hotel groups, not for small businesses generally. Its own pricing page names three tiers, and none of them mention restaurants, salons, dental practices, or any business outside hospitality:
- Lite: about €70/month per property (around €100 billed monthly), up to 50 rooms, 150 AI drafts a month.
- Core: about €130/month per property (around €160 billed monthly), any number of properties, 500 AI drafts a month.
- Intelligence: about €210/month per property (around €290 billed monthly), adds an AI research assistant, unlimited API access, and reporting.
- Extra replies beyond the included draft count run about €0.30 each, on every tier.
The draw is real: one queue for Google, Booking.com, Expedia, TripAdvisor, Trip.com, Agoda, HRS, HolidayCheck, Airbnb, Hostelworld, OpenTable, and effectively any other site through a browser extension, all trained on your past replies so the tone matches your brand. For a hotel selling heavily through OTAs, replying in one place instead of eleven browser tabs is worth paying for. There's a two-week free trial with 40 replies included and no card required, enough to see if the workflow fits before you commit. If you run a hotel and want reply examples specifically, see our hotel review response examples or the hotel industry page.
The question that actually decides this: the OTA coverage test
Most 'MARA alternative' searches skip the real question. It isn't whether MARA is good, it is. It's whether your reviews are spread across enough platforms to need a tool built for that spread. Here's a three-step check to run before you shop:
- Pull up your last 20 to 30 reviews, wherever they actually sit: Google Business Profile, the Booking.com extranet, TripAdvisor's management center, Expedia Partner Central.
- Count how many of those platforms have real review volume on them, not just a listing that technically exists.
- If it's three or more platforms with genuine volume, a multi-platform tool earns its per-property price. If it's overwhelmingly one platform, usually Google, a single-platform tool is the better buy.
In practice this splits hotels into two groups. A branded property selling heavily through Expedia and Booking.com, with a genuine spread of reviews across five or six sites, is exactly who MARA is built for. An independent inn, boutique property, or bed-and-breakfast that gets most of its bookings direct or through a Google search almost always sees the overwhelming majority of its public reviews land in one place: Google. Paying a multi-platform, per-property price to manage a review pile that's 90% on one site is the same mistake as buying a full suite to do a job a focused tool already handles.
The alternatives at a glance
Treat every price as approximate. This category changes often, so verify current terms before you buy.
- MARA (our benchmark): hotels only, Google plus 10+ booking sites in one queue, about €70 to €210 per property per month, two-week free trial.
- Resparo: any small business including hotels, Google only, replies held for your approval on anything sensitive, $29.99/month unlimited (free for 10 replies/month, no card). See current pricing.
- ReplyOnTheFly: any small business, Google only, free forever tier plus a roughly $9.99/month Pro plan with an optional auto-post mode.
The picks, by situation
You sell heavily through OTAs and see reviews spread across several sites
Stay with MARA, or start the free trial if you haven't. This is the one job it's actually built for: pulling Google, Booking.com, Expedia, TripAdvisor, and the rest into a single reply queue, in a consistent brand voice, without you living in eleven extranets. Paying per property stings for a larger group, so weigh the annual-vs-monthly gap (roughly 20 to 30% depending on tier) before you commit.
Almost all of your public reviews are on Google
This describes most independent hotels, inns, and boutique properties, and it's where MARA's price stops making sense. A focused Google-only tool does the actual job for a fraction of the cost. Resparo writes each reply in your voice and posts the routine ones automatically, while anything with a specific claim, a safety issue, a billing dispute, a named staff member, waits for your one-tap approval instead of going out on autopilot. There's a free reply generator you can test right now with no signup.
“Room was clean but the AC rattled all night and the front desk didn't have a fix when I called down. Would think twice before booking again.”
David, thank you for flagging this, and I'm sorry the AC cost you sleep on top of the front desk not having an answer for you in the moment. That's a maintenance gap and a training gap, and we're fixing both. I'd like to make the stay right, please reach out directly and I'll take care of it personally.
You want the cheapest possible Google-only option
ReplyOnTheFly has a real free forever tier (unlimited drafts, a handful of posted replies a month) and a roughly $9.99/month Pro plan with unlimited posts and an optional auto-post mode. It's a fine choice if budget is the only constraint, just know that full auto-post means a reply can go out on a bad review before you've seen it, which is the one thing worth a human eye on first.
- Count your platforms before you shop, not after.
- Keep anything with a specific claim (safety, billing, a named employee) out of full auto-post.
- Check whether pricing is per property or per account before you compare totals across a group.
- Don't pay for 11-platform coverage to manage a review pile that's 90% on Google.
- Don't assume every 'AI review reply' tool is interchangeable. Ask exactly what platforms are covered and how overage is billed.
- Don't switch to anything that routes unhappy guests to a private form and only sends happy ones to public review sites. That's review gating, and it violates Google and FTC rules.
“The right review tool isn't the one with the most platforms. It's the one that matches where your guests actually write.”
Before you switch
One reassurance and one warning.
You won't lose any reviews. Every review lives on the platform a guest posted it to, Google, Booking.com, TripAdvisor, wherever, not inside MARA or any other reply tool. Switching software only changes what helps you answer them, not what's already public.
Don't gate reviews to make the switch 'easier.' Routing dissatisfied guests to a private feedback form while sending only happy ones to Google or your OTAs violates Google's policy and US FTC rules, and it isn't worth the risk on any budget. For the how-to on the reviews themselves, see our guides on hotel review response examples and Google review automation. For the wider field beyond hotels, our full review reply software comparison goes deeper than hotel tools alone.
